Documentary On HEAVY METAL Director Launches KickStarter Campaign

Shock Till You Drop

Documentary On HEAVY METAL Director Launches KickStarter Campaign

New film about Canadian animator and director of cult adult animation hit HEAVY METAL seeks funding.

The first time I saw the nude female form it was ludicrously exaggerated, writhing in the running time of what would eventually be one the most famous adult animated, dark fantasy films of all time: 1981’s Ivan Reitman produced anthology HEAVY METAL. It’s no wonder I’m so messed-up.

The film was, of course, based on stories within (and the legacy of) famed X-rated magazine HEAVY METAL, itself a licensed U.S. version of the French erotic/horror/fantasy comic magazine METAL HURLANT.

The berserk, ultra-gory, wildly sexual and unapologetically ludicrous film was a Canadian production but employed scores of animators from all over the world, featured voice work from virtually all of the cast members of beloved Canuck comedy series SCTV and sported a legendary hard rock soundtrack featuring BLACK SABBATH, BLUE OYSTER CULT, NAZARETH and more. It’s an unforgettable film and is, when it’s not being silly, often quite disturbing (remember the Dan O’Bannon-penned sequence where the green ‘Loc-Nar’ alien turns the WW2 fighter pilots into skeletal zombies? Yikes!).

The film was directed by the maverick British/Canadian animator Gerald Potterton, an Oscar nominated filmmaker who has worked with Buster Keaton. John Candy, Ringo Starr and Vincent Price among many, many other legendary talents.

The man has been animating for almost 70 years and has led many lives, packed with many adventures.

Indeed, Potterton’s life IS cinema and now, filmmaker Laurie Gordon – a longtime friend and fan – has begun work on a documentary about the man entitled THE FLYING ANIMATOR (its title stemming from Potterton’s other life as a rabid aviation enthusiast).

I’ve had the honor of spending some time with Potterton in Toronto, where myself and filmmaker Chris Walsh (THE SHUTTERBUG MAN) screened a 35mm print of HEAVY METAL and had the director with us for a pre-show dinner and amazing Q&A. The HEAVY METAL stories alone would make for a remarkable movie but truthfully, HM is only a footnote in a remarkable life spent making daring, beautiful and bizarre art.

To check out Gordon’s KickStarter campaign to get the finishing funds for THE FLYING ANIMATOR watch the video below. And, for thrills, below that check out the trailer for the still badass-as-all-get-out HEAVY METAL!

The post Documentary On HEAVY METAL Director Launches KickStarter Campaign appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

Exclusive Photos From Michael Berryman Gore Western KILL OR BE KILLED

Shock Till You Drop

Exclusive Photos From Michael Berryman Gore Western KILL OR BE KILLED

 

  SHOCK gets its spurs on exclusive shots from new splatter western KILL OR BE KILLED.

 

First BONE TOMAHAWK locked horror great Sid Haig in a showy cameo and now another red western drags a genre vet into a lawless land. Formerly titled RED ON YELLA, KILL A FELLA (I title I wayyyy prefer), directors Duane Graves and Justin Meeks’ new splatterific western opus KILL OR BE KILLED, stars horror icon Michael Berryman as well as THE TEXAS CHAIN SAW MASSACRE vet Edwin Neal. The film has just locked a DVD and VOD release date from RLJ Entertainment of March 1st, 2016.

 

And SHOCK has some exclusive photos to share right now…

Here’s KILL OR BE KILLED’s official synopsis:

“Claude “Sweet Tooth” Barbee and his gang of cutthroat outlaws – the most wanted men in Texas – are on a desperate ride across five hundred miles of badlands to recover a fortune in hidden loot from their most daring robbery. But Barbee and his crew aren’t the only coldblooded killers riding the range. With a large “dead or alive” cash bounty on their heads, the outlaws are being picked off one by one. What began as a hard journey driven by greed becomes a feverish race to survive in what the Austin Chronicle calls ‘a spaghetti Western chock-full of grit and blood’.”

KILL OR BE KILLED also stars co-director Meeks, Paul McCarthy-Boyington, Arianne Margot, Luce Rains,Greg Kelly, Bridger Zadina, Deon Lucas, Karrie Cox and Larry Grant Harbin.

Have a look at these exclusive shots:

 

 

The post Exclusive Photos From Michael Berryman Gore Western KILL OR BE KILLED appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

Exclusive Interview: Maverick Canadian Filmmaker Larry Kent Talks SHE WHO MUST BURN

Shock Till You Drop

Exclusive Interview: Maverick Canadian Filmmaker Larry Kent Talks SHE WHO MUST BURN

SHOCK catches up with Canadian indie cinema pioneer Larry Kent to discuss his first horror film, SHE WHO MUST BURN.

Larry Kent has been making movies and pissing people off since 1962.

He is Canada’s original independent filmmaker, an idiosyncratic provocateur whose early classics like THE BITTER ASH (1963) were chopped up, banned, lost, condemned, and even, in the case of HIGH (1969), the target of police raids. Kent’s late career renaissance began in the 2000s, with overdue career retrospectives in cinematheques across Canada and the release of 2005’s THE HAMSTER CAGE, a darkly hilarious and distressing family dysfunction ensemble that was a minor festival smash.

More recently, a teaching gig at Vancouver Film School connected Kent with a group of rising multi-hyphenate west coast talents, including filmmakers/actors Andrew Moxham, Shane Twerdun, and Andrew Dunbar (the team behind this year’s exceptional WHITE RAVEN, who became the core of Kent’s new cast & crew collective. Together they made EXLEY (2011), an improvised Kafkaesque nightmare about one man’s humiliating odyssey to scrape up $1000 for a cross-country flight to visit his dying mom.

Now at the spritely age of 82 (!), Larry Kent has yet again pounced and pummeled the polite reputation of Canadian cinema by making the most ferocious film of his career, the painful, bloody, incendiary SHE WHO MUST BURN. Emotional and intentionally baiting, soaked in classic genre tropes, it’s a horror-siege-witchhunt with no punches withheld, as Kent pits a hypocritical triumvirate of religious fanatics in a brutal assault on a women’s health counselor (played by Sarah Smyth) determined to provide support to marginalized women in their neglected community, no matter the cost.

The film was co-written with Shane Twerdun, who played the title role in EXLEY and stars in SHE WHO MUST BURN as dangerous evangelist Jeremiah Baarker, the de facto leader of the Baarker clan after his patriarch father Abraham is jailed for an abortion clinic double homicide. Jeremiah and his sister Rebecca (Missy Cross, who contributes some gorgeous folk-country, old time religion to the score) both flirt the edge of caricature in their roles as homicidal, deluded lunatics breeding toxicity among their congregation. Rebecca speaks in tongues, receives visions from a vengeful god, and drags her ineffectual husband Caleb (co-producer Andrew Dunbar) to commit an act of irreparable violence that begets ever worse.

The film opens with a brewing storm – the worst in decades – as we enter this unnamed American small town where economic opportunities are minimal to nil. The main employer is a coal factory knowingly putting workers’ lives at risk by shunning the extreme weather warnings. The factory’s constant pump of pollutants into the groundwater is also the cause for a localized spike in stillborn babies (the most recent belonging to Rebecca Baarker, which we witness in a particularly chilling sequence). An outsider, Angela (Sarah Smyth) has made her home here and is determined to hold on to her counseling practice, despite the loss of state funding and being threatened on a daily basis by anti-abortion rallies outside her house, which she shares with her partner, the town’s Deputy Sheriff Mac (Andrew Moxham, editor of EXLEY and director of WHITE RAVEN).

Things start off pretty bad and take a plunge for the worse when Jeremiah rapes and assaults his wife Margaret (Jewel Staite), who flees to Angela for help to escape the clutches of her husband. From here things slide down, down, down as the Baarkers attempt to make the film live up to its title.

Kent’s film is spitting, spewing, punching angry, not offering the slightest wiggle room in its damning stance on extreme pro-lifers and the modern Christian Right (a nuanced look at the abortion debate, this ain’t!). Kent makes his point very clear: when we combine ruthless capitalism, indifferent government oversight, no social safety net, narrow economic options, and a fear mongering, manipulative and hostile church leadership, what we get is the destruction of women and families and a population that mistakes blind hate for community action.

SHE WHO MUST BURN won the inauguralBarry Convex Award for Best Canadian Feature at the 2015 Fantasia International Film Festival (“That really was wonderful!” says Kent) and it’s easy to see why. Rarely does Canadian cinema swing with bare knuckles quite like this. SHE WHO MUST BURN just concluded its American debut at Another Hole in the Head Film Festival in San Francisco, and plays next weekend at Toronto’s Blood in the Snow Film Festival at 2:00 PM on Sunday, November 29th (Kent will be in attendance). The screening will be followed at 4:00 PM by the World Premiere of Andrew Moxham’s WHITE RAVEN, made by many of the SHE WHO MUST BURN cast & crew (sans Kent). In my opinion, these are the two best – certainly the most gut-punching – films of the festival.

SHOCK speaks to the wonderfully cheery and off-the-cuff Larry Kent from his home in Montreal, as he reflects on SHE WHO MUST BURN and complains regularly about memory loss (“I’m 82 years old! I can’t remember yesterday!”).

SHOCK: How did you end up making such a ferociously angry movie at this point in your career?

KENT: I don’t know. The word “angry” kind of surprises me. I just thought I made a thriller, that’s all. You’re about the fourth or fifth critic that has said that. I didn’t realize that I was angry at all.

SHOCK: Oh come on. You must be a very calm man, then, Larry.

KENT: Fuck you! I’m okay, how are you doin’, you prick?

SHOCK: It’s usually the young guy making the violent, brutal, ferocious movie and then softening with age. But as for you…

KENT: …more violent and more brutal as I get older! I love the idea that it’s angry, because I’m really pissed off at everything that’s been said about taking away a woman’s right to choose. It pisses me off, and I thought, nobody’s really talking about it in a “what the fuck is this about?” way.

SHOCK: That’s what I find so compelling about the movie. It follows a particular mindset to its ultimate, terrible conclusion. It just says: “This is horrible. Look at this.”

KENT: That’s absolutely true. To me, why would you deny a woman their right to health because you don’t agree with abortion? I mean, the whole abortion issue is just terrible, and it happens in BC too, where they have… what do you call it? Where a man of my age can marry a fourteen-year-old as his 35th wife.

SHOCK: Oh, you mean the Polygamists in Bountiful, BC?

KENT: They sell wives. I mean, I thought slavery would be absolutely verboten. But it’s not. These guys are terrible, just terrible.

SHOCK: My takeaway message from SHE WHO MUST BURN is that if you’re stuck in a situation with people of this mindset, just get out while you’ve got the chance. Angela’s (Sarah Smyth) failing was thinking she could stay and make a difference.

KENT: That’s absolutely correct. Well, she was committed. She was committed to the women there. And there was only one answer for her. Shane (playing Jeremiah Baarker) had one answer (the title of the movie), that’s it. And he did it.

SHOCK: You’ve worked with a similar team on a few projects now, and they have made other projects without you. But there is a continual creative overlap. Can you tell me how you first met this group of actors and filmmakers, and how that team came to be?

KENT: Meeting those guys was not only fortuitous, but it was very simple. I was invited to go teach at Vancouver Film School. I was then introduced to Shane and Andrew Moxham, who were at the school while I was there. Andrew Dunbar came and went – he wasn’t as tied to the school as those two. And while teaching, they were a great, great help to me, and when I did EXLEY (2011), they were very involved in it. Andrew Moxham was the editor. It was a totally improvised movie, and Shane was the lead, which he did marvelously. This relationship has continued, even today. The problem with SHE WHO MUST BURN really lay in finding a crew for shooting and editing and everything else while we had Moxham and Andrew and Shane as actors. I’ve also worked with Missy Cross very much. She was at the school when I was teaching. I’ve always thought that she had terrific talent.

SHOCK: Yeah, Missy’s amazing. I worked with her on a few projects a few years ago. She also did some incredible music for SHE WHO MUST BURN, with the folk-country blues of her band Wooden Horsemen. Beautiful stuff, it fits gorgeously in the movie.

KENT: Oh, yeah. They did really good music. Composer Alex Hauka was also great. And of course, Missy has another woman she does music with, Brittany Willacy (as The Cross Legged Willies). We had everything going, but we didn’t have a cameraman.

SHOCK: Your DOP Stirling Bancroft’s work is superb. He’s a great guy. I worked with him on the Bruce Sweeney film EXCITED (2009).

KENT: He had just been in New York doing something, and my editor suggested him. He’s a partner with the editor, Elad Tzadok, and it’s through him I got Stirling, and that was a great find. Stirling is terrific. That’s one thing I’ve got to say about BC, they have really good cameramen. Every film I’ve ever worked on in Vancouver, I’ve had great cameramen. I had Doug McKay in when WHEN TOMORROW DIES (1965), and I had Dick Bellamy on  THE BITTER ASH (1963) and SWEET SUBSTITUTE (1964). And Vince Arvidson on EXLEY (2011). He was really terrific. Every cameraman I’ve ever had in Vancouver has been fabulous.

SHOCK: Your last film EXLEY (which also premiered at the Fantasia Film Festival) was entirely improvised. Obviously, you had the general framework for the story in place, and then improvised the scenes as you went. But SHE WHO MUST BURN certainly feels a lot tighter.

KENT: This film is scripted. Completely scripted.

SHOCK: I assumed so. How did EXLEY develop?

KENT: Bill Marchant (actor, director, and professor at Vancouver Film School) wrote an outline of 14 pages and asked me to make a film. Shane was there and what we did is we took the whole film and broke it up into scenes. And then we asked all the actors to come in and see us, and we talked with them – this conversation was a week or two before the shoot. We didn’t get them to improvise [at that time], because I think in improvisation, you’ve got to go to the first take. The first improvisation is certainly the best. But we told them exactly what was going to happen and what we wanted from the scene, so they understood what the character was. Then when we shot, we did every scene with the actors improvising. The film was usually shot within two or three takes, each scene.

SHOCK: So the with SHE WHO MUST BURN, you and Shane wrote it together?

KENT: I wrote a story, and then we got together and we worked on the script. We knew all the actors, there wasn’t an actor we didn’t know. Which is a great help. I even got one of my early, early actresses into the film, Patricia Dahlquist. She played the nurse, which is fun. She’s been in every film that I’ve made in British Columbia; she was in THE BITTER ASH, SWEET SUBSTITUTE, WHEN TOMORROW DIES, all along the line. And then she was the mother in THE HAMSTER CAGE.

SHOCK: It’s a wonderful and fascinating career trajectory for you, over the last 5-6 years, to have this core group together with so many overlapping projects.

KENT: Absolutely. And they’re great guys. And I really, really like the article that you wrote because I really agree with it. I thought Moxham did a terrific film.

SHOCK: For the Blood in the Snow festival-goers, it’s going to be a heavy Sunday afternoon. WHITE RAVEN is going to feel like a nice, bright, uplifting twist after SHE WHO MUST BURN.

KENT: (BURSTS OUT LAUGHING) I’m sure Andrew Moxham is going to be upset at that. A nice, uplifting film is not what he thinks he made.

SHOCK: Another project made by the same crew is a 2014 remake of your first film HASTINGS STREET (1962), which sat on the shelf for 45 years, before sound was added and post-production finished in 2007 (well-known Vancouver actor Nicholas Lea voiced the lead role played by Alan Scarfe, star of THE BITTER ASH). Was the same crew involved in the restoration of that film and did that lead to their remake?

KENT: No, that was done with another crew. But they really liked the movie, and they thought it could be made again, and I think they were not incorrect. I think they did a really good job, but it’s so difficult to get an independent film shown. I think it’s getting a little better with the output of Netflix and all of the streaming options. But getting an independent film seen is so difficult. I like HASTINGS STREET. I really think it’s worth seeing.

SHOCK: But you weren’t involved with that production, aside from the fact that they were remaking your work?

KENT: No, I try to be hands off on their projects. They’re very talented! Why do they need me?

SHOCK: Because you make great movies together! SHE WHO MUST BURN being a perfect example.

KENT: Did you like the film?

SHOCK: Yeah, I love it. It’s an intense film. I felt… hurt at the end of it. I felt pained.

KENT: That’s good! That’s great!

The world needs people like Larry to keep us on edge, to keep the creative juices flowing, to remind us that age is no excuse for inaction. If you’re in Toronto, don’t miss SHE WHO MUST BURN at the Blood in the Snow Film Festival, screening 2:00 PM on Sunday, November 29th, with Larry Kent, Andrew Moxham, Shane Twerdun and possibly more cast & crew members present to answer your questions and possibly offend a few people.

The post Exclusive Interview: Maverick Canadian Filmmaker Larry Kent Talks SHE WHO MUST BURN appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

New Trailer and Artwork For Natalie Dormer Creeper THE FOREST

Shock Till You Drop

New Trailer and Artwork For Natalie Dormer Creeper THE FOREST

SHOCK previously reported on the eerie new Natalie Dormer-starring horror film THE FOREST and then shared the first official teaser poster; now we’re sharing with you the alternate teaser poster and the chilling new trailer…

Here’s the official synopsis:

“Rising with terrifying grandeur at the base of Mt. Fuji in Japan, the legendary real-life Aokigahara Forest is the suspense-filled setting of the supernatural thriller.  A young American woman, Sara (Natalie Dormer of  GAME OF THRONES and THE HUNGER GAMES), journeys there in search of her twin sister, who has mysteriously disappeared. In the company of expatriate Aiden (Taylor Kinney), Sara enters the forest having been well warned to ‘stay on the path’. Determined to discover the truth about her sister’s fate, Sara will have to face the angry and tormented souls of the dead that prey on anyone who dares come near them. These malevolent spirits lying in wait for Sara at every turn will plunge her into a frightening darkness from which she must fight to save herself.”

Gramercy Pictures releases THE FOREST in theaters nationwide on Friday, January 8th, 2016.

The post New Trailer and Artwork For Natalie Dormer Creeper THE FOREST appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

Trailer: THE ORPHANAGE Director J.A. Bayona’s Haunting New Film A MONSTER CALLS

Shock Till You Drop

Trailer: THE ORPHANAGE Director J.A. Bayona’s Haunting New Film A MONSTER CALLS

Revered filmmaker reveals trailer for new film A MONSTER CALLS.

Director Juan Antonio Bayona proved himself a master of  meticulously detailed atmosphere with both the Guillermo del Toro produced ghost story THE ORPHANAGE and the harrowing, based-on-fact survivalist drama THE IMPOSSIBLE. Now, the filmmaker brings his talents to A MONSTER CALLS, the big-screen adaptation of writer Patrick Ness’ same named novel.

Lewis MacDougall, Felicity Jones, Toby Kebbell, Liam Neeson and Sigourney Weaver star in this “visually spectacular” dark drama about 12-year-old Conor (MacDougall) and his attempts to deal with his mother’s (Felicity Jones) illness and the bullying of his classmates by escaping into a fantastical world of monsters and fairy tales that explore courage, loss, and faith.

While not a gory, adult-oriented horror film, A MONSTER CALLS looks like the ideal point of entry for younger audiences looking for both a parable about their own lives and an escape into a richly designed landscape of strange beasts and special effects.

If you aren’t buying any of this, we suggest you have a look at the absolutely beautiful trailer below:

A MONSTER CALLS will be released via Focus Features in October 2016.

The post Trailer: THE ORPHANAGE Director J.A. Bayona’s Haunting New Film A MONSTER CALLS appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

Secretly Scary: 1962’s DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES

Shock Till You Drop

Secretly Scary: 1962’s DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES

Author Lee Gambin’s SECRETLY SCARY is a celebration of movies that were not marketed as horror films but contain hidden horrors ripe for discovery and discussion.

“You know what I’d like to do? I’d like to go to a nice place and have a drink.” – Kirsten Clay

With a tagline reading: “In it’s own terrifying way it is a love story”, Blake Edwards’s harrowing exploration into the disastrous effects of alcoholism DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES is a devastating character study that reads like a monster movie in that it presents its two leads as desperate loners isolated by their overwhelming addiction. This heartbreaking and bleak doomed romance is written, directed and performed with such bloodletting sensitivity, stark awareness and revelatory sophistication that it is thoroughly gripping and determinedly unsettling. The film sets itself up as a hangover from the romantic comedies of the fifties starring the likes of Rock Hudson and Doris Day, but is painted with such sinister undertones that that entire mood is completely destroyed and swept away as we are swiftly introduced to two characters who hold each other captive as accountable crutches, with a half empty bottle of booze in each hand.

Joe Clay (Jack Lemmon) is in public relations (but considers himself more so a corporate pimp), and he is the kind of guy that is in charge of other people’s happiness and never really considers his own. He is also an alcoholic, but not truly aware of how severe his drinking is. On a job he meets a pretty secretary named Kirsten (Lee Remick) who doesn’t touch alcohol, but is “nuts about chocolate”. After a couple of failed attempts, he finally convinces Kirsten to go on a date with him, and it is here that he buys her a chocolate-flavored drink that she takes a liking to. Joe, like many alcoholics, is desperate to find a devoted drinking partner and sees potential in Kirsten – here the film jets off like a vampire movie, in that the original undead (the established boozer) initiates his “victim” and in turn inducts them into the world of vampirism (alcoholism).

Drinking is the backbone of Joe and Kirsten’s relationship, and the film details this in a mesmerizing and perpetually engaging manner – this is a horror film where addiction, dependence, alienation, sadness, overwhelming loneliness and disconnection all permeate the delicate human condition and where the true monsters emerge from the frail desire to be loved, accepted, warranted and desired.

When Joe first visits Kirsten’s apartment, armed with bags of booze, he takes on the building’s cockroach problem with bug sprays which infuriates her neighbours. The angry tenants (like angry villagers in a classic Universal horror film) collect along the bannisters of the stairwell shouting out their complaints about the smell of the bug spray which sends Kirsten and Joe into a laughing frenzy and into each other’s arms. This incredible moment summarises their ill-fated love affair with astounding subversive intelligence, it suggests that Joe Clay’s drunken feeble attempt to tend to a cockroach infestation instantly ostracizes he and Kirsten, and soon enough as their alcoholism transforms them into hopeless wrecks, their own personal bugs (bought on from the liquor) will control them, torment them and ultimately destroy them.

“They are not long the days of wine and roses…” whispers Kirsten (reciting a poem) as she watches the empty bottle of whiskey she and Joe have shared on a San Francisco pier descend into the watery depths: a profound condensation of her and Joe’s own personal descent into the depths of uncontrollable alcoholism.

After they are married, Joe and Kirsten have a baby which adds a strain to Joe’s alcoholism and helps lead to Kirsten’s reach out to the bottle. In one of the most confronting scenes of the film, Joe returns home after a night working/drinking and he lashes out at Kirsten, screaming at her and demanding that he wants to be allowed to drink – but more importantly, that he wants to drink with his wife. What makes it even more monstrous is that before this violent outburst occurs, we are witness to a bumbling Jack Lemmon as Joe Clay crashing into a glass door, having a rose stem get caught in the elevator and coming across as the clown audiences were so used to seeing. But as the scene progresses and the confrontation with his wife gets painfully ugly and scary, it is scarring and horrific. Lemmon, primarily known to cinema audiences for his comedic roles fuelled with jittery neurosis, emerges himself in a warts and all dramatic schizoid which is both difficult and relentlessly depressing to watch. Lemmon is purely spectacular.

The music by Henry Mancini drives the horror home, it seeps in and fouls the atmosphere heightening the distress and torment. The image of a crying, drunk Joe Clay looking over his restless baby in her crib is a depressing image of a man rendered alone if his wife, the convert-to-be, doesn’t drink with him. The closing moment of this scene has Kirsten comfort the shambolic Joe as she downs a glass of bourbon. This is her descent into monstrousness and her transformation from demure, quiet, mousy beauty to ravaged and addled harpy who terrorizes Joe later in the film – screaming at him “I’m a woman! Can’t you hear me?!” in a desperate plea to be looked upon with respect and admiration. She also turns alcoholism into something that is an essential attribute to the makings of a man – she yells at the weary eyed Joe who (by the closing moments of the film) has been going to Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, “I want someone who has the guts to have a drink!”

Lee Remick is phenomenal in a role that undergoes such a dramatic transformation – her early moments as the tea-totalling meek secretary cement her as a likeable working class girl, and when she hits the booze in order to keep her man, Remick unleashes a powerhouse of a performance that truly frightens the horses. She delivers an electric counterpart to Jack Lemmon’s frenzied imp locked in the grips of liquor’s curse.

The film plays with horror movie tropes in a thought out manner – for example, when Joe and Kirsten slip during their few days of sobriety and decide to sneakily drink, they get completely sloshed while an aggressive storm complete with thunder and lightning crashes outside. When Joe ventures out into the storm in order to creep into Kirsten’s father’s greenhouse to find his hidden stash of booze, he turns into a maniacal monster hell bent on finding his poison. The magnificent dance between light and shadow made all the more grim with the stark black and white photography and the transition from Joe Clay as a gleeful drunk suddenly turning into a desperate wailing lunatic pushes the film into monster-movie terrain. The startling image of Joe’s trembling dirt stained hand reaching out of the bottle is much like any celluloid aberration clutching at the throat of a hapless victim. Following this creepy sequence we have a completely trashed Kristen being dragged by the scruff of her neck by her father and forced into a shower of freezing cold water, moments before lashing out at her daughter who frets for her mother’s sanity and safety. This is truly horrifying and confronting cinema de morne and much like any werewolf film or Jekyll and Hyde outing, DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES successfully paints a picture of duality, monstrous transition and the power of dismay, despair and the fragility of will power. The sequences where Joe is detoxing and painfully undergoing a cold turkey treatment are nightmarish and startling – they are truly akin to scenes involving torture and mental and emotional anguish in horror movies to come throughout the decade including Roman Polanski’s REPULSION (1965).

JP Millner’s story was originally filmed as a teleplay starring Piper Laurie (CARRIE, RUBY) as Kirsten and Cliff Robertson as Joe Clay, while the Blake Edwards film became a feature presentation at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings throughout the sixties. The organisation of AA itself would feature as a salvation point for the character of Joe Clay, but prove to be meaningless to the lost cause that Kirsten becomes. The true tragedy here is that the hardened alcoholic cautiously heads towards a path of sobriety, while the woman he introduced to the horrors of the bottle becomes a screeching mess, lost in a well of loneliness and depressing addiction.

The post Secretly Scary: 1962’s DAYS OF WINE AND ROSES appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...

TV Recap: AMERICAN HORROR STORY: HOTEL Episode 507, ‘Flicker’

Shock Till You Drop

TV Recap: AMERICAN HORROR STORY: HOTEL Episode 507, ‘Flicker’

SHOCK recaps last night’s chilling episode of AMERICAN HORROR STORY: HOTEL.

Remodeling has begun on the Hotel Cortez. The construction guys are alarmed that they found a steel wall hiding something that wasn’t on any blueprints. Will doesn’t care and instructs them to tear into it. Behind it the construction workers find a long-abandoned hallway that smells like death. Something moves in the background. In a second, the men are set upon by two severely malnourished vampires. Who are these vampires? How did they get there? 

To find out, we must go back to 1925. The Countess was a movie extra, desperate to leave her mark on the world by becoming a star. She is flattered when the film’s star, Rudolph Valentino, invited her back to his house that night. He is married, but the rumor mill claims he is in the middle of a divorce. The Countess arrives at his home, completely in awe of Valentino. Before they dine, they dance a seductive tango when Valentino’s wife, Natacha Rambova, comes down the stairs. They both calm the Countess, promising that their “divorce” was at the behest of the studio. The Countess is taken with both of them. The tango continues with all three, and before long they end up in bed together.

A few months later, the Countess attends the swanky opening party of the Hotel Cortez with an actress friend of hers. She has been carrying on with the Valentinos in private, and her friend is dying to know who her new beau is. Mr. March makes a toast to his new hotel, and catches the Countess’ eye. A man bursts in with a newspaper, screaming that Valentino is dead, and the Countess runs from the room. Her world is falling apart, as she was truly in love with both Rudolph and Natacha, and she prepares to fling herself out the window. Before she can, March grabs her from behind and promises never to let go.

Shortly thereafter, the Countess marries March in a simple ceremony in the hotel lobby. She only married him because she needed to be taken care of, but she admits she was attracted to his dark side. They have rough, choking sex, and one night she walks in on him carving up a hobo. Rather than be horrified, she is turned on. The Countess encourages him to kill wealthier victims, so that she may get their jewels – then they both win. And one more thing: next time, she wants to watch.

Months go by. The Countess shows up to Valentino’s crypt every day, dressed in black veils, to deliver a single red rose. (A mysterious “woman in black” used to do the same at the real Valentino’s crypt.) This time, Natacha is there to greet her. The Countess is offended that she hasn’t heard from her former lover since Valentino’s death, but she has a bigger surprise: Valentino isn’t really dead. Rudolph steps out from the shadows to reveal himself to the shocked Countess, and tell his tale.

While touring the country to promote his final film, The Son of the Sheik, he noticed a strange man eyeballing him. He was not part of the press, and he never said a word to Valentino; he just watched him from afar. Valentino began to think he was losing his mind. But the man finally revealed himself to Valentino. This was German director F.W. Murnau. While researching his masterpiece, Nosferatu, he went to the Carpathian mountains where he discovered the “blood disorder” – in the middle of an insane orgy, naturally. Murnau had been watching Valentino and wanted to bestow this gift of immortality to him. Valentino accepts. When he returned returned home, his studio reported he was ill, bringing Natacha to his bedside. He bestowed upon her the “gift” and faked his own death. Buried in his tomb is his stunt double. Now, Valentino and Natacha want to give the Countess this gift and travel the world together. She agrees.

But unfortunately, March was watching from afar.

On the day that Rudolph and Natacha were to meet the Countess at the train station, March showed up at their house with a couple of goons, who beat the pair unconscious. When they wake, they find they are in a room at the Hotel Cortez. The window has been bricked up. Out in the hallway, they discover every other room in the hall has been bricked up. And the end of the hall? Hidden behind a thick sheet of metal, behind more bricks and drywall. March has sealed the vampires in the hotel.

So it was Rudolph and Natacha who attacked the construction workers. They then attack a real estate agent, but they are still hungry and weak. Across the hall are three big Thunder From Down Under performers. After drinking them all down, they finally feel sated. Dressed in sleek new clothes, with a healthy glow, they stroll out the front door of the hotel, with Iris watching them curiously. 

The Countess and March have an arrangement: monthly dinner dates. This solution seems to be a happy compromise between the two – but the Countess doesn’t know about her sire. She requested their dinner a week early because she has an announcement: she and Will are getting married. He fakes support and enthusiasm, but asks that when she murder him, to do it off property. How uncomfortable would it be if they kept running in to each other for all eternity? She suggests that she might not kill this one, and tells him that she never loved him, which she has never kept secret. This enrages March and he takes great pleasure in telling her what happened to her first love.

Elsewhere, John has checked himself into the West Los Angeles Health Center, a public psych ward. Alex wants to put him into a nicer, private hospital, but John is fine here. It turns out that he is fine here because this is all a ruse. He had gone back to the department to do some more work on the Ten Commandment Killer. John tried to find out from his partner who the suspect was they had in custody. When Hahn doesn’t answer, John tries to beat the information out of him. In the melee, he sees West Los Angeles Health Center in one of the files.

Now that he is here, he knocks out the single security guard in charge of the criminal unit and goes to room 153. Using stolen keys, he opens the door to find a young girl standing there, motionless. She introduces herself as Wren, and she and John seem to be having two separate conversations. She “doesn’t want to feed anymore,” and John, thinking she was at the scene of the crime and in shock, insists that she doesn’t have to be scared, that he will protect her from the man who did these horrible things. Of course, we know that it was Wren who did those “horrible things.” She was there for all the murders, and says she wasn’t forced to do anything, but promises to take him to the man’s house if he gets her out of there. She repeats that she is tired of “this” and the “feeding” and basically of all the vampire stuff – without being oblique enough for John to pick up on what is going on. John bonds with her by telling her about the trouble with his own daughter. This warms Wren up enough to tell him about her creepy father, who used to tell her that he “couldn’t wait for her to grow up.” The things he said, and the way he said it made her stomach hurt. One day (in 1986) he went into the Hotel Cortez and left her in the hot car. She was ready to die, but suddenly the glass shatters and the Countess is there. We see this in flashbacks; John thinks her dad is the killer, but Wren assures him he died long ago.

John and Wren sneak out of the hospital. Now he wants to be taken to the killer. “We need to go home, to the Hotel Cortez,” Wren insists. John promises to kill the man if need be. Wren really likes John. “I hate to see it end.” She runs into the street and is flattened by a big rig.

The post TV Recap: AMERICAN HORROR STORY: HOTEL Episode 507, ‘Flicker’ appeared first on Shock Till You Drop.

more info...